Pre-Service Teacher’s Views on the use of Metaphors for Describing the Concepts of Uncertainty and Entanglement in Teaching Quantum Physics
Abstract views: 441
/ 
PDF downloads: 320
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v11i1.14Keywords:
Quantum physics, Metaphors, Pre-service teacher educationAbstract
Quantum physics is a fundamental theory of physics heavily relying on its description by mathematical structures. However, its successful handling ensures in no way its conceptual understanding. So teaching quantum physics in high school faces the problem of adequate strategies. Often visualisations are used in order to provide anchors for students. These have to be chosen carefully to avoid misconceptions. At the same time an adequate verbal explanation of quantum phenomena or of their visualization is sought as physics language is shaped by classical physics. As an additional method for teaching we propose the use of metaphors for making the quantum physical mechanisms more insightful without interference from classical physics.
Downloads
References
Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bells inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 49(2), 91–94.
Bertlmann, R. A., & Zeilinger, A. (Eds.). (2013). Quantum (un) speakables: from bell to quantum information. Berlin: Springer.
Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2007). Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010105.
Ceroni, G. (2014). Exploring the use of metaphor in communication of contemporary physics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1324–1332.
Chown, M. (2008). Quantum theory cannot hurt you: a guide to the universe. Faber & Faber.
Fischler, H., & Lichtfeldt, M. (1992). Modern physics and students’ conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 181-190.
Hüfner, J. & Löhken, R. (2010). Physik ohne Ende.: eine geführte Tour von Kopernikus bis Hawking. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Kohnle, A.Cassettari, D., Edwards, T. J., Ferguson, C., Gillies, A. D., Hooley, C. A. & Sinclair, B. D. (2012). A new multimedia resource for teaching quantum mechanics concepts. American Journal of Physics, 80(2), 148-153.
Michelini, M., Ragazzon, R., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2000). Proposal for quantum physics in secondary school. Physics Education, 35(6), 406.
Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theoryguided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96, 849–877.
Orzel, C.(2009). How to teach quantum physics to your dog. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Pospiech, G. (1999). Teaching the EPR paradox at high school? Physics Education, 34(5), 311.
Ritchie, S. M. (1994). Metaphor as a tool for constructivist science teaching. International Journal of Science Education,16, 293-303.
Schrödinger, E.(1935). Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807–812, 823–828, 844–849.
Singh, C., Belloni, M., & Christian, W. (2006). Improving students' understanding of quantum mechanics. Physics Today, 59(8), 43.
Zeilinger, A. (2003). Einsteins Schleier: die neue Welt der Quantenphysik. München: CH Beck.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Authors
