A Computational Model of Maxwell’s Distribution for Undergraduates
Abstract views: 343 / PDF downloads: 671
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v13i2.142Keywords:
Maxwell’s distribution, random numbers, ideal gas, kinetic theory, MATLABAbstract
In this paper we employ a numerical approach to perform simulations of Maxwell distribution for several dimensionalities, based on the Central Limit Theorem. We show that by increasing the number of molecules of the gas N, the simulated distributions tend toward the respective theoretical distributions. Also, we observed that by increasing the model temperature n, the distribution shifted toward higher speeds, in agreement with theoretical results. The numerical simulations provide a physical definition of the concept of temperature. The codes used to perform the simulations are quite easy to construct and implement, while the results strikingly satisfy theoretical expectations. Furthermore, the actual approach makes it possible to skip the mathematical details and explain the distribution by just following the algorithm of simulations. We recommend such approach as a demonstrative tool that can be shown in a lecture class thus enriching the teaching quality and improving students’ understanding.
Downloads
References
Aiello-Nicosia, M.L., & Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M. (1985). Computer simulation of a two-dimensional ideal gas: a simple molecular dynamics method for teaching purposes. European Journal of Physics, 6, 148-153.
Behringer E., & Engelhardt L. (2017). Guest editorial: AAPT Recommendations for computational physics in the undergraduate physics curriculum, and the Partnership for Integrating Computation into Undergraduate Physics. American Journal of Physics. 85, 325-6.
Bellomonte, L., & Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M. (1997). A statistical approach to the second law of thermodynamics using a computer simulation. European Journal of Physics, 18 (1997) 321-326.
Bonomo, R. P., & Riggi, F. (1984). The evolution of the speed distribution for a two-dimensional ideal gas: A computer simulation. American Journal of Physics, 52, 54; http://doi.org/10.1119/1.13809
Boriçi A. (2019). Fizika me anë të programimit në Octavë dhe C++. Lecture notes in Albanian.
Cox D. R., & Miller H. D. (1972). The theory of Stochastic Processes. Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom.
Daineko Y., Dmitriyev V., & Ipalakova, M. (2017). Using virtual laboratories in teaching natural sciences: An example of physics courses in university. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 25, 39-47.
Feller W. (1957). An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. I, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, United states.
Ftačnik, J., Lichard, P., & Pišut, J. (1983). A simple computer simulation of molecular collisions leading to Maxwell distribution. European Journal of Physics, 4, 68-71.
Huang, K. (1987). Statistical Mechanics, 2nd edition. John Wiley & sons. New York, United states.
Jameson, G., & Brüschweiler, R. (2020). Active Learning Approach for an Intuitive Understanding of the Boltzmann Distribution by Basic Computer Simulations. J. Chem. Educ., 97, 10, 3910-3913. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00559
Lemons D. S. (2013). A student’s guide to entropy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Magana A. J., & Silva–Coutinho G. (2017). Modeling and simulation practices for a computational thinking‐enabled engineering workforce. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 25, 62-78.
Pantellini, F. G. E. (2000). A simple numerical model to simulate a gas in a constant gravitational field. American Journal of Physics 68, 61-68. http://doi.org/10.1119/1.19374
Reichl L. E. (2016). A Modern Course in Statistical Physics, 4th edition. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
Sarabando C., Cravino J. P., & Soares A. A. (2014). Contribution of a computer simulation to students’ learning of the physics concepts of weight and mass. Procedia Technol. 13, 112-21.
Schmidt–Böcking, H., Schmidt, L., Lüdde, H.J., Trageser W., Templeton A., & Sauer T. (2016). The Stern-Gerlach experiment revisited. The European Physical Journal H 41, 327-364. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2016-70053-2
Serway R. A., & Jewett J. W. (2014). Physics for scientist and engineers with Modern Physics, 9th edition. Brooks/Cole, Boston, United States.
Taub R., Armoni M., Bagno E., & Ben–Ari M. M. (2015). The effect of computer science on physics learning in a computational science environment. Comput. Educ. 87, 10-23.
van Kampen, N. G. (2007). Stochastic processes in Physics and Chemistry, 3rd edition. North Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Yetilmezsoy K., & Mungan C. E. (2018). MATLAB time-based simulations of projectile motion, pendulum oscillation, and water discharge. European Journal of Physics, 39, 065803 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aadaee
Zupančič, B., & Sodja, A. (2013). Computer-aided physical multi-domain modelling: Some experiences from education and industrial applications. Simul. Model. Pract. Th. 33, 45-67.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Klaudio Peqini, Rudina Osmanaj
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Authors