Use of portfolios to correct alternative conceptions and enhance learning

Takawira Kazembe

doi:10.51724/ijpce.v2i1.181

Authors

Takawira Kazembe University of Zimbabwe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v2i1.181

Keywords:

Alternative conceptions, action research, conceptual change, constructivist theory, portfolio

Abstract

Forty first-year primary school student teachers at a Teacher Training College in Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe, participated in an action research study, employing the science student portfolio, during February to July, 2008 . They used the portfolio to record their prior knowledge about the lesson topic, new information learnt during the lesson, and how the new information related to their prior knowledge. Comments on lessons, monthly tests and assignment scores, reflections and a page-long conclusion were also recorded in the portfolio. The monthly test scores improved as the study progressed. Interviews revealed that alternative conceptions emanated from teachers, peers, textbooks, and the failure of students to understand teachers’ explanations. Students’ and administration’s comments revealed stakeholders’ satisfaction with the portfolio’s effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abell, S. K. & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475-487.

Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, L.W., & Marek, E.A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 105-120.

Adesoji, F. A. & Babatunde, A. G. (2008). Investigating Gender Difficulties And Misconceptions In Inorganic Chemistry At The Senior Secondary Level, International Journal of African & African American Studies, Vol. VII, No. 1, Jan 2008.

Arter, J. (1990). Reported in “Project to Advance Science Education”, College of Education & Health Professions, University of Arkansas. Retrieved 24 May 2009.

Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.

Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1978. Reprinted 1986, New York: Werbel & Peck.

Bergquist, W. & Heikkinen, H. (1990). Students’ ideas regarding chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(12), 1000-1003.

Best, J. W. & Kahn, J. V. (1993). Research into Education. London: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 183-241.

Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston. Allyn and Bacon, pp 29-149.

Borg, M. D., Borg, W. R. & Gall, J. P.(1996). Educational Research: An Introduction. U.S.A: Longman, pp 203-204.

Bordner, G.M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of Knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63, (10), 513-514.

Bucat, R. B. (ed.) (1984). The elements of chemistry: Volumes 1 and 2. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.

Chambers, S. K. & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (2), 107-123.

Cho, H., Kahle, J. B., & Nordland, F. H. (1985). An investigation of high school biology textbooks as sources of misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and some suggestions for teaching genetics. Science Education 69: 707–719.

Coll, R. K., (2008). (2008). Do We Expect Too Much? Reflection on Chemistry Content in Higher Education. A publication from the NZIC Chemical Education Special Interest Group, University of Waikato, Chemistry in New Zealand.

Committee on undergraduate studies. US (1997). Misconceptions as barriers in understanding science. In Science teaching reconsidered: A handbook (chap. 4). Retrieved January 22, 1004, from http://books.nap.edu/readingroom/books/str/4.html.

Conpolat, N., Pinarbasi, T., Bayrakceken, S. & Geken, O. (2006). The conceptual change approach to teaching chemical equilibrium. Research Science & Tecknological Education, 24 (2), 217-235.

Costa, V. B. (1997). How teacher and students study “all that matters” in high school chemistry. Journal of Science Education, 19, 1005-1025.

De Jong, O., Acampo, J., & Verdonk, A. (1995). Problems in teaching the topic of redox reactions: Actions and conceptions of chemistry teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 1097-1110.

Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986)._Aconstructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105–122.

Gilbert, J. K., & Zylberstajn, A. (1985).Aconceptual framework for science education: The case study of force and movement. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 107–120.

Gitomer & Duschl, R. A. (1995). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. (2000). Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education (CSMEE), p. 122, Retrieved 23 May, 2009.

Haury, L. & Rillero, P. (2007), Perspectives of hands-on science teaching, (1994), http://www.nerel.org/schs/ares/issues/conent/entrareas/eric/eric-3html. Retrieved 16 November 2007.

Horton, C., Worcester, MA 01602 with other members of the Modeling Instruction in High School Chemistry Action Research Teams at Arizona State University: June 2001, August 2002 and August 2004, Student Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry (Originally: Student Misconceptions and Preconceptions in Chemistry).

Huddle, P. A., & Pillay, A. E. (1996). An in-depth study of misconceptions in stoichiometry and chemical equilibrium at a South African University. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 65–77.

Johnson, B. (2004). Exclusive interview with Dr Benny Johnson, President & CEO, Quantum Simulations, Inc., Published on Sunday, October 03, 2004 - 10:41 PM PST, Source: Distance-Educator.com, Retrieved 25 January, 2009.

Kind, V. (2004). Beyond Appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas, 2nd Edition, School of Education, Durham University, UK. Selfpublished; available at http://www.chemsoc.org/pdf/LearnNet/rsc/miscon.pdf (Vanessa Kind as formerly Vanessa Barker.), Retrieved 16 May 2009.

Krishnan, S. R., & Howe, A. C. (1994). The mole concept: Developing an instrument to assess conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(8), 653–658.

Kruger, C. & Summers, M. (1988). Primary school teachers’ understanding of science concepts. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14, 13-17.

Lewis, E. & Linn, M. (1994). Heat, Energy and Temperature Concepts of Adolescents, Adults and Experts: Implications for Curriculum Development. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 31(6), 657-77.

Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G., Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1985, pp. 214-215.

Lumina, C., (2005). Giving greater students responsibility for their own learning: Portfolio assessment and peer marking as tools for promoting self-directed learning in second year law course. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19(3), 482-496.

MacMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S., (1993). Research in Education: A conceptual introduction. New York: Harper. Collins. College Publishers. p. 376.

Magagula, C., (2001). The issue of paradigms in educational research: Keeping the debate alive. The Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 233-254.

McRobbie, C. & Tobin, K. (1995). Restraints to reform: the congruence of teacher and student actions in a chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 373-385.

Meyer, H. (2007). Is it molecules? Again! A review of students' learning about particle theory. The Chemical Education Journal, 9(2) (Serial No. 17).

Mifflin, H. (1997). Students as active partners. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1997. http://www.eduplace.com/rgd/res/assess/partners.html. Retrieved 10 April 2008.

Modell, H., Michael, J., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2005). Helping the Learner to Learn: The Role of Uncovering Misconceptions. The American Biology Teacher, 67(1), 20-26. 2005. Retrieved 25 May, 2009.

Moseley, C., (2000). Standards Direct Pre-service Teacher Portfolios. Science and Children, 37(5), 30-43.

Mulford, Douglas R., & Robinson, William R. (2002). An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions among First-Semester General Chemistry Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79 (6), 739-744.

Nakhleh, M. (1992). Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 1992, 69(3), 191-196.

Novak, J. D. (2000). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies (LIPHs) leading to empowerment of learners, jdn2@gte.net, Cornell University. Retrieved 27 February, 2009.

O’Brien, R. (1998). An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research. Faculty of Information Studies, University of Toronto. obrienr@fis.utoronto.ca

Özmen, H. (2004). Some Student Misconceptions in Chemistry: A Literature Review of Chemical Bonding, Plenum Publishing Corporation.

Pheeney, P. (1998). Portfolio. Science Teacher, 65(4), 36-39.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66, 211–217.

Priscilla, R. (2002). Qualitative Methods: A field guide for applied research in sexual and reproductive health. Family Health International: North Carolina. pp 28-29.

Strauss, S. (1981). Cognitive development in school and out. Cognition, 10, 295-300.

Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (1997). Constructivism and concept learning in chemistry: Perspectives from a case study. Researching Education 58: 10–20.

Taber, K. (2000). Chemistry lessons for universities?: A review of constructivist ideas. University Chemistry Education, 4, 63–72.

Taber, K. S. (1998). Physics in Chemistry [Key concept: the chemical bond]. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 597.

Taber, K. S. (2001). Constructing chemical concepts in the classroom?: Using research to inform the practice. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2, 43–51.

Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Atomic and molecular structure in chemical education: A critical analysis from various perspectives of science education. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 922–925.

Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 249–262.

Winter, R. (1989). Learning from experience: principles and practice in action research. London: Falmer Press: 36-68.

Yager, R. E. (1991). The Constructivist Learning Model. Science Teacher, 67(1), 4-45.

Zoller, U. (1996). The Use of Examinations for Revealing and Distinguishing Between Students' Misconceptions, Misunderstandings and "No Conceptions" in College Chemistry. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 317-326.