Science Teachers’ Perspectives on Science-Technology-Society (STS) in Science Education
Abstract views: 319
/ 
PDF downloads: 272
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v2i2.187Keywords:
Science Technology and Society STS, Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices, Science Teacher EducationAbstract
Research supports the idea that teachers are crucial change agents in educational reform and that teachers’ beliefs are precursors to change. This study investigates Egyptian science teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning science through Science Technology and Society STS education. Data were collected using a questionnaire. The findings of this study suggest that the Egyptian science teachers hold mixed beliefs (constructivist and traditional) concerning science education goals, their roles and their students’ roles within teaching and learning science through STS and concerning teaching/learning science through STS. The findings shed light on the relationship between teachers’ beliefs and their practises. Lastly, the study revealed a number of factors that caused inconsistency between teachers’ beliefs and their practices.
References
Afifi, Y. (1998). Enquiry skills in science textbooks for the preparatory stage. Journal of Science Education. 1 (1)163-182. (published by Egyptian Society for Science Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo) (In Arabic).
Aguirre, J., Haggerty, S., & Linder, C. (1990). Student-teachers’ conceptions of science, teaching, and learning: a case study in preservice teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 381-390.
Aikenhead, G. (1984). Teacher decision making: the case of Prairie high. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 167-186.
Aikenhead, G. (2000). STS in Canada: From policy to student evaluation. In D.D. Kumar & D.E. Chubin (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice (pp.49-89). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Aikenhead, G. (2004). STS education: a rose by any other name. In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science Education: Responding to the work of Peter Fensham (pp.59-75). London, Rouledge Falmer.
Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Aikenhead, G., & Ryan, A. (1989). The development of a multiple choice instrument for monitoring views on science-technology-society topics. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: University of Saskatchewan, College of Education.
Aikenhead, G., & Ryan, G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: Views on Science-Technology-Society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl & Beckman, J. (Eds.), Action control: from cognition to behaviour (pp.11-39). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behaviour. London: Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioural control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behaviour, Journal of Applied social Psychology, 32, 1-20.
Amer, E. (2003). The effectiveness of using invention techniques in developing written composition and creative thinking of Egyptian EFL students. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
ASE (1981). Education through Science. ASE: Hatfield.
Bakar, E., Bal, S., & Akcay, H. (2006). Preservice science teachers beliefs about sciencetechnology and their implication in society. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 18-32.
Barnes, B. (1985). About science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bybee, R. (1984). Global problems and science education policy, In R. Bybee, J. Carlson & A. McCormack (Eds.), Redesigning Science and Technology Education 1984 NSTA Yearbook (pp. 60-75). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
Bybee, R., & Mau, T. (1986). Science and technology related global problems: in international survey of science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 599-618.
Carroll, T. M. (1999). Developing partnerships: teacher beliefs and practices and the STS classroom. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual international conference of the association for the Education Teachers in Science (pp.331-338). Greenville, NC: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED431626)
Clough, E. E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of consistency in the use of students’ conceptual frameworks across different task contexts. Science Education, 70(4), 473-496).
Dillon, J., & Manning, A. (2010). Science teachers, science teaching: Issues and challenges. In J. Osborone & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 20-45), (2nd Edition). Berkshire: Open University Press.
Dimopoulos, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2003). Science and technology education for citizenship: the potential role of the press. Science Education, 87, 241-256.
Duggan, S. & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 661-679.
Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Forth Worth TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Eijkelhof, H., & Lijnse, P. (1988). The role of research and development to improve STS education: experiences. International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 464-474.
El-Nemr, M., & Tolymat, H. (2000). New prospective role for Biology teachers relevant to the year 2000 and beyond. paper presented to Proceedings of International Symposium conference “BioEd 2000” the Challenge of the next Century, 15-18 May, in the MNHN Grande Galerie de l'Evolution.
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-64.
Fensham, P. J. (1988). Approaches to teaching of STS in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 346-356.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, London.
Foster, P. (1996). Observational Research, in R. Sapsford and V. Jupp, eds., Data Collection and Analysis (pp.57-93). Newbury Park CA., SAGE.
Gahin, G. H. (2001). An investigation into EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices in Egypt An explanatory study, Ph.D Thesis, school of Education, University of Exeter. Exeter, UK.
Gliem, J., & Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. Paper presented at In 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education. Columbus, OH.
Hart, E. P., & Robottom, I. M. (1990). The Science-technology-society movement in science education: A critique of the reform process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(6), 575-588.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: new minds for changing world. Science Education, 82, 407-416.
Jegede, O. J. (1988). The development of the science, technology and society curricula in Nigeria. International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 399-408.
Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 703-710.
Kaya, O., Yager, R., & Dogan, A. (2009). Changes in attitudes towards Science–Technology–Society of Pre-service Science Teachers. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 257-279.
Klein, P. (1996). Preservice teachers' beliefs about learning and knowledge. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research. Vol XLII, 4, 361-377.
Koballa, T., et al. (2000) Prospective gymnasium teachers’ conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching, International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 209-224.
Kolstoe, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
Kranzberg, M. (1991). Science-Technology-Society: It’s as simple as XTZ!. Theory Into Practice, 30(4), 234-241.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edn). Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press.
Levitt, K. E. (2001). An analysis of Elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science, Science Education, 86, 1-22.
Longbottom, J., & Butler, P. (1999). Why teach science? Setting rational goals for science education, Science Education, 83, 473-492.
Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Hofstein, A. (2007). Involving Science Teachers in the Development and Implementation of Assessment Tools for "Science for All" Type Curricula, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 497–524.
Mansour, N. (2007). Challenges to STS: Implications for science teacher education. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 27(6), 482-497.
Mansour, N. (2008). The experiences and Personal Religious Beliefs of Egyptian science teachers as a framework for understanding the shaping and reshaping of their beliefs and practices about Science-Technology-Society (STS). International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1605-1634.
Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 25-48.
Mansour, N. (2009). Science-Technology- Society (STS): A new paradigm in Science Education. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 27(6), 482-497.
Mansour, N. (2010). The impact of the knowledge and beliefs of Egyptian science teachers in integrating an STS based curriculum. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(4), 513-534.
Marton, F., Beaty, E. and Dall’Alba, G. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277-300.
McCann, T., & Johannessen, L. (2004). Why do new teachers cry? The clearing House, 77(4), 134-145.
Munby, H. A. (1984). A qualitative approach to the study of a teacher’s beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 27-38.
Muskin, C. (1990). Constraint of teaching methods and opportunity to learn in high school history classes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED322038).
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Osborone, J. (2010). Science for citizenship. In J. Osborone & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp46-67), (2nd Edition). Berkshire: Open University Press.
Ost, D. H., & Yager, R. E. (1993). Biology, STS & the next steps in program design & curriculum development. American Biology Teacher, 55(5), 282-287.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Education Research, 62, 307-332.
Pedretti, E., & Hodson, D. (1995). From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 463-485.
Poulson, L., Avramidis, E., Fox, R., Medwell, J., & Wary, D. (2001). The theoretical orientation of primary school literacy teachers: an exploratory study of orientations to reading and writing, Research Papers in Education, 16(3), 271-292.
Quicke, J. (2001). The science curriculum and education for democracy in the risk society. Journal of curriculum Studies, 33(1), 113-127.
Ramsey, J. (1993). The science education reform movement: implications for social responsibility. Science Education, 77, 235-258.
Ramsey, J., & Hungerford, H. (1989). The effects of issue investigation and action training on eighth-grade students’ environmental behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3), 31-36.
Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socioscientific issues. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Ravitz, J., Becker, J., & Wong, Y. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers. Retervied November 12, 2004, Available at http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/findings.html.
Rubba, P. A. (1991). Integrating STS into school science and teacher education: Beyond awareness. Theory into Practice, 30, 303-308.
Rubba, P., & Harkness, W. (1993). Examination of pre-service and in-service science teachers' beliefs about science-technology-society interactions. Science Education 77(4), 407-31.
Ryder, J. (2002). School science education for citizenship: strategies for teaching about the epistemology of science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(6), 637- 658.
Shipman, M. (1967)ç. Theory and practice in the education of teachers. Educational Research, 9, 208-212.
Simonneaux, L. & Albe, V. (2002). Teaching socially controversial scientific: resistances and motivations, real or perceived? In J. Lewis, A. Magro, L. Simonneaux (eds.), Biology Education For The Real World -Student - Teacher - Citizen. Toulouse: ERIDOB –ENFA, pp. 121-134.
Smith, W. (2007). Social desirability bias and exit survey responses: The case of a first nations campground in Central Ontario, Canada. Tourism Management, 28(3), 917-919.
Solomon, J. (2004). The UK and the movement for science, technology, and society (STS) education. In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science Education: Responding to the work of Peter Fensham (pp.76-90). London, Rouledge Falmer.
Celik, S., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2006). The effect of a ‘Science, Technology and Society’ course on prospective teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 24(2), 255-273.
Taber, K. S. (2000) Multiple frameworks? Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 399-417.
Tairab, H., H. (2001) Pre-service teachers' views of the nature of science and technology before and after a science teaching methods course. Research in Education, 65, 81-87.
Thirumarayana, M. O. (1998). An explanatory study of the relationships among science, technology, and society (STS) issues as conceived by fifth grade students. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 10(1), 60-75.
Tsai, C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771-783.
Vázquez Alonso, A., Manassero, M. A. & Acevedo, J. A. (2005). Quantitative analysis of complex multiple-choice items in science technology and society: Item scaling. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 7 (1). Retrieved April 14, 2010, year from: http://redie.uabc.mx/vol7no1/contents-vazquez.html
Waks, L. J. (1987). A technology credo. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 7(1-2), 357-366.
Wiesenmayer, R., & Rubba, P. (1999). The effects of STS issue investigation and action instruction versus traditional life science instruction on seventh grade students’ citizenship behaviors. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8 (2), 137-144.
Yager, R. E. (1993). Science - Technology – Society as Reform. School Science and Mathematics, 93(3), 145-151.
Yalvac, B., Tekkaya, C., & Kahyaoglu, E. (2007). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ views on science-technology-society issues. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 331-348.
Yetişir, M., & Kaptan, & F. (2008). STS from a historical perspective and its reflection on the curricula in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 3-8.
Yildirim, C. (2000). Philosophy of science. Istanbul: Remzi Publication.
Za’Rour, G. I. (1987). Forces hindering the introduction of STS education in schools. In Jegede, O. J. (1988) The development of the science, technology and society curricula in Nigeria. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (4), 399-408.
Ziman, J. (1994). The rationale of STS education is in the approach. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds). STS education: international perspectives on reform. (pp.21-31). London: Teachers College Press.
Zoller, U., Donn, S., Wild, R., & Beckett, P. (1991). Teachers’ beliefs and views on selected science-technology-society topics: A probe into STS literacy vs STS indoctrination. Science Education, 74, 541-561.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Authors
