A Thematic Review of Some Studies Investigating Students’ Alternative Conceptions About Energy
Abstract views: 652 / PDF downloads: 407
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v3i1.189Keywords:
Thematic Review, Energy Concept, Alternative Conceptions, Science Education, Physics EducationAbstract
Since science education researchers, teachers, curriculum developers, and policy makers elsewhere, who have, or plan to use energy concept in their studies may have a busy schedule to track related studies, a review and synthesis of the studies of alternative conceptions of students about the energy concept are valuable for them. Therefore, the present paper presents a detailed thematic review of students’ alternative conception studies about the energy concept to highlight relevant people on the studies’ needs, methods, general knowledge claims and implications. Hereby, we may compile and notice where we are on students’ alternative conceptions related with energy concept. To this end, each study was described by using a thematic matrix. The aim of alternative conception studies about energy concept generally have been to emerge students’ understanding, determine appropriate age to teach energy concept, and compare understanding based on age or culture. While the methods of studies on exploring students’ understanding consist of interviews, paper and pencil surveys, and free writing, their analysis consist of classification, comparison, statistical, description, interpretation and praxeological. In light of the general knowledge claims, it can be deduced that most of the studies has highlighted that students have alternative conceptions about energy concept. The studies under investigation generally recommended taking into account their findings in teaching processes.
Downloads
References
Bodner, G.M. (1990). Why Good Teaching Fails and Hard-Working Students Do Not Always Succeed. Spectrum, 28(1), 27-32.
Boylan, C. (2008). Exploring elementary students’ understanding of energy and climate change. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(1), 1-15.
Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1123–1130.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education, 6th ed. New York: Routledge.
Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Ebenezer, J.V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 29-50.
Çalık, M. (2006). Devising and Implementing Guide Materials Related to “Solution Chemistry” Topic in Grade 9 Based on Constructivist Learning Theory. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Domenech, J.L., Gil-perez, D., Gras-marti, A., Guisasola, J., Torregrosa, J.M., Salinas, J., Trumper, R., Valdes, P. & Vilches, A. (2007). Teaching of Energy İssues: A Debate Proposal for a Global Reorientation. Science & Education, 16, 43-64.
Driver, R. & Warrington, L. (1985). Students use of the principle of energy conservation in problem situations. Physics Education, 29, 171-176.
Duit, R. (1984). Learning the Energy Concept in School-Empirical Results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19, 59–66.
Dysthe, O. (2002). Theoretical background for portfolios as learning and assessment tools in teacher education (Paper presented at the NERA/NFPF Conference, Tallin).
Finegold, M. & Trumper, R. (1989). Categorizing pupils’ explanatory frameworks in energy as a means to development of a teaching approach. Research in Science Education, 19, 97-110.
Goldring, H. & Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ Difficulties with Energy and Related Concepts. Physics Education, 29(1), 26-32.
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381.
Hırça, N., Çalık, M. & Akdeniz, F. (2008). Investigating grade 8 students’ conceptions of ‘energy’ and related concepts. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(1), 75–87.
Konuk, M. & Kılıç, S. (1999). Misconceptions of freshman students about energy sources in plants and animals. III. National Science Education Symposium’98, Proceedings book, 199-202.
Köse, S., Bağ, H., Sürücü, A. & Uçak, E. (2006). The Opinions of Prospective Science Teachers’ About Energy Sources for Living Organisms. International Journal of Enviromental and Science Education, 1(2), 141-152.
Kurnaz, M.A. (2007). Analysis of Learning Situations of the Energy Concept at University Year 1 Level. Unpublished Master Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Kurnaz, M.A. & Çalık, M. (2008). Using Different Conceptual Change Methods Embedded within 5E Model: A Sample Teaching for Heat and Temperature, Journal of Physics Teacher Education. Online, 5(1), 3-10.
Kurnaz, M.A. & Çalık, M. (2009). A thematic review of ‘energy’ teaching studies: focuses, needs, methods, general knowledge claims and implications. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 1(1), 1-26.
Kurnaz, M.A. & Sağlam Arslan, A. (2009). Using the Anthropological Theory of Didactics in Physics: Characterization of the Teaching Conditions of Energy Concept and the Personal Relations of freshmen to this Concept. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 72-88.
Küçük, M., Çepni, S. & Gökdere, M. (2005). Turkish Primary School Students’ Alternative Conceptions about Work, Power and Energy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(2), 22-28.
Mathews, M.R. (2000). Constructivism in Science and Mathematics Education. In D.C. Phillips (Eds.), National Society for the Study of Education, 99th Yearbook, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 161-192.
Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry? Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
Odell, J.L. (2005). Student Understanding of Conservation of Energy and Mass in Introductory University Science Courses. Unpublished Master Thesis, The University of Maine, Orono.
Osborne, R.J. & Gilbert, J.K. (1980). A method for investigating concept understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education, 2, 311-321.
Osborne, R.J. & Wittrock, M.C. (1983). Learning science: a generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508.
Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Children’s Science. In R. Osborne and P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in Science: The implications of children’s science, 5–14, Hong Kong: Heinemann.
Özsevgeç, T. (2007). Determining Effectiveness of Guided Materials about “Force and Motion” Unit Based On the 5E Model for Elementary Students. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Papadouris, N., Kyratsi, T. & Constantinou, C.P. (2004). Student Understanding of Energy as a Model that Accounts for Changes in Physical Systems (Paper presented at the GIREP Conference Proceedings: Teaching and Learning Physics in new Contexts, Ostrava).
Sağlam Arslan, A. & Kurnaz, M.A. (2009). Prospective physics teachers’ level of understanding energy, power and force concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), Article 6.
Sağlam Arslan, A. (2009). Cross-Grade Comparison of Students’ Understanding of Energy Concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(3), 303-313.
Taber, K.S. (2002). Alternative conceptions in chemistry: Prevention, diagnosis and cure? The Royal Society of Chemistry, London.
Trumper, R. (1993). Children’s energy concepts: a cross-age study. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 139-148.
Trumper, R. & Gorsky, P. (1993). Learning about energy: the influence of alternative frameworks, cognitive levels, and closed-mindedness. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 637-648.
Trumper, R. (1996). A survey of Israeli physics students’ conceptions of energy in pre-service training for high school teachers. Research in science & Technological Education, 4(2), 179-192.
Trumper, R. (1997a). A survey of conceptions of energy Israeli pre-service high school biology teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 31-46.
Trumper, R. (1997b). The need for a change in elementary school teacher training: the case energy concept as an example. Educational Research, 39(2), 157-174.
Trumper, R. (1998). A longitudinal study of physics’ students’ conceptions on energy in preservice training for high school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(4), 311-318.
Watts, D.M. (1983). Some Alternative Views on Energy, Physics Education, 18, 213–217.
Yager, R. (1991). The Constructivist Learning Model Towards Real Form in Science Education, The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52-57.
Yuengyong, C., Jones, A. & Yutakom, N. (2008). A comparison of Thailand and New Zealand students’ ideas about energy related to technological and societal issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 293-311.
Ünal, S., Calik, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. (2006). A review of chemical bounding studies: needs, aims, methods of exploring students’ conceptions, general knowledge claims and students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 4, 141-172.
Ünal Çoban G., Aktamış H. & Ergin Ö. (2007). The Views of 8th Grade Students about Energy. G.Ü. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15 (1), 175-184.
Yürümezoğlu, K., Ayaz, S. & Çökelez, A. (2009). Grade 7-9 Students’ Perceptions of Energy and Related Concepts. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (NEFMED), 3(2), 52–73.
White, R.T. & Gunstone, R.F. (1992). Probing Understanding, The Falmer Press, London.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Authors