Teaching with Concept Mapping Instructional Strategy in Nigeria Secondary Schools
Abstract views: 199
/ 
PDF downloads: 104
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v4iSI.101Keywords:
Concept Mapping, Concept Mapping Instructional Strategy, Generalized Motion of Movement of Particles or Objects, Motion Concept MapAbstract
The research study investigated the effects of teaching with Concept Mapping instructional strategy on learning achievement in Nigeria Secondary Schools. The research study adopted the Quasi-Experimental Research design. The population comprised of a sample of 168 Senior Secondary School Class-two Physics students purposively selected from Senior Secondary Schools across Ekiti State, Nigeria. The Instrument used consisted in two parts: a) Motion Concept Map developed for the research study and; b) printed materials in the form of tutorial test items developed and used to elicit responses to the treatment. The research hypotheses tested were; there is no significant effect of treatment on students’ learning achievement; there is no significant effect of treatment on students’ retention; there is no significant effect of treatment on students’ learning attitude. The research study revealed that: Concept Mapping Instructional strategy contributed to learning achievement in physics; there is significant effect of treatment on students’ retention of learned materials; there is significant effect in students’ learning attitude. Result established that the instructional strategy when integrated with any method of instruction resulted in improved learning achievement.
Downloads
References
Abimbade, A. (1997). Principles and Practice of Education Technology. Ibadan. International Publishers Ltd.
Aladejana, F. (2007). The implications of ICT and NKS for science teaching: Whither Nigeria, Complex Systems, 17, 113–124.
All, A. & Havens, R. (1997). Cognitive/Concept mapping: A teaching strategy in nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(6), 1210-1219.
Cañas A., Novak, J. & Gonzalez, F. (2004). Concept maps, theory, methodology and technology. Spain. Proceeding of the first International Conference on Concept Mapping.
Clarence, J. (1944). A study of the learning and retention of materials presented lecture and by silent film. Journal of Educational Research, 38(1), 47–58.
Choi, B. & Gennaro, E. (1987). The effectiveness of using computer simulated experiments on junior high students’ understanding of the volume displacement concept. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(6), 493-500.
Dean, A.Z. (2008). Teaching and learning physics with interactive video. Lincoln, USA. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Publishers. pp. 1-4.
Edward, F.R. (1996). New Models of Physics Instruction Based on Physics Education Research: Part 2. USA. University of Maryland.
Hay, D., Kinchin, I. & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295-311.
Jegede, O., Okebukola, P. & Ajewole, G. (1992). Student’s attitude to the use of the computer for learning, and achievement in biological concepts. Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria. 27(2), 61-65.
Kathy, P., Wendy, A., Noah, F., Christopher, K., Carl W., Mike, D., Krista, B., Ron L., Sam, R. & Noah, P. (2006). High-Tech. tools for teaching physics: the physics education technology project (PhET). Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 111-121.
Nahum, K. (1987). Building an Organized Knowledge Base: Concept Mapping and Achievement in Secondary School Physics. USA. Georgia State University.
Novak, J. (1990). Concept Mapping: A useful tool for science education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 45-49.
Novak, J. & Canas, A. (2006). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition: Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01.
Shea, P., McCall, S. & Özdoğru, A. (2006). Adoption of the multimedia educational resource for learning and online teaching (MERLOT) among higher education faculty: evidence from the state University of New York learning network, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 136-156.
Uniserve Science (2009). Strategies for Tertiary Science Teaching and Assessment. Australia. University of Sydney Press.
Valadares, J., Fonseca, F. & Soares, M. (2004). Using Conceptual Maps in Physics Classes. Spain. University of Alberta.
Wendell, H. (1970). Experimental Physics Education. Illinois, USA. University of Illinois Press.
Zollman, D.A. & Robert, G.F. (2008). Teaching and Learning Physics with Interactive. Video. Lincoln, USA. University of Nebraska Lincoln Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Eurasian Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Authors
