Science Teacher Professional Development for Inclusive Practice

  • Simone Abels Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Keywords: Inclusion, Inquiry-based science teaching, Professional vision, Reflection, Video-based study

Abstract

Most subject teachers are not specifically educated for inclusion. Inclusive practice at classroom level remains a blind spot. This case study provides insight into the inclusive practice of two science teachers by video-based participant observation and then uses the data as a basis for professional development. The videos were recorded in an inquiry-based science class of an urban “inclusive middle school” in Austria. The two science teachers of this class reflected upon their own instruction. Three more science teachers reflected upon the others’ teaching. The focus of the study was on what the teachers noticed and reasoned as they viewed the videos. The reflective sessions were audiotaped. Grounded Theory was used to analyze and compare the data. Surprisingly, the results show that inclusion was not often addressed and it was especially difficult to discover in others’ teaching; however, implicit connections to inclusive, but not subject-specific teaching principles, can be drawn.

References

Abels, S. (2016). Chemieunterricht und Inklusion - zwei unvereinbare Kulturen? (Chemistry education and inclusion – two incompatible cultures?) In J. Menthe, D. Höttecke, T. Zabka, M. Hammann, & M. Rothgangel (Eds.), Befähigung zu gesellschaftlicher Teilhabe. Beiträge der fachdidaktischen Forschung (pp. 323–334). Münster, New York: Waxmann.

Abels, S. (2015). Scaffolding inquiry-based science and chemistry education in inclusive classrooms. In N. L. Yates (Ed.), New developments in science education research (pp. 77–96). New York City: Nova.

Abels, S. (2014). Inquiry-Based Science Education and Special Needs – Teachers’ Reflections on an Inclusive Setting. Sisyphus - Journal of Education, 2(2), 124–154.

Abels, S., & Schütz, S. (2016). „Fachdidaktik trifft Inklusive Pädagogik“ [“Subject-matter education meets inclusive pedagogy”]. Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 67(9), 425-436.

Amrhein, B., & Reich, K. (2014). Inklusive Fachdidaktik (Inclusive subject didactics). In B. Amrhein & M. Dziak-Mahler (Eds.), Fachdidaktik inklusiv: Auf der Suche nach didaktischen Leitlinien für den Umgang mit Vielfalt in der Schule (pp. 31–44). Münster: Waxmann.

Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002).Teachers' attitudes towards integration/inclusion: a review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 129-147.

Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463-482.

Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94, 577-616.

Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417-436.

Breuer, F. (2011). Predecessor-successor transitions in institutional and interpersonal contexts. On the development of a theory of the transfer of personal objects. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(2), www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1653/3269.

Bromme, R. (1992). Der Lehrer als Experte: Zur Psychologie des professionellen Wissens [The teacher as expert: to the psychology of professional knowledge]. Bern: Huber.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

Dann, H.-D. (2008). Lehrerkognitionen und Handlungsentscheidungen. [Teacher cognitions and action decisions] In M. W. Schweer (Ed.), Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion (pp. 177-207). Heidelberg: VS.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev

Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281-301.

Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005).Peripheral vision: Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26, 779-792.

Ernst, K. (1996). Den Fragen der Kinder Raum geben [Give room to the children's questions]. Die Grundschulzeitschrift, 98, 40-45.

Feyerer, E. (2012). Allgemeine Qualitätskriterien inklusiver Pädagogik und Didaktik [General quality criteria of inclusive pedagogy and didactics]. Zeitschrift für Inklusion, 0(3), Retrieved Nov 21 2016 from http://www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/51/51.

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 813-828.

Gibbons, L. K., & Cobb, P. (2017). Focusing on teacher learning opportunities to identify potentially productive coaching activities. Journal of Teacher Education, 68, 411–425.

Goldman, R. (2007). Video representations and the perspectivity framework: Epistemology, ethnography, evaluation and ethics. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. J. Denny (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 3-37). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.

Griffiths, C. (2013). Using grounded theory to analyze qualitative observational data that is obtained by video recording. Grounded Theory Review. An International Journal, 12(1).

Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible Learning. London: Routledge.

Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 791–806.

Janík, T., Seidel, T., & Najvar, P. (2009). Introduction: On the power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning. In T. Janík & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 7-19). Münster: Waxmann.

Jensen, B. (2010). The OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) and teacher education for diversity. In OECD (Ed.), Educating teachers for diversity (pp. 63-92). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Kleinknecht, M. & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and feel when analyzing videos of themselves and other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 13-23.

Korthagen, F. A. J., Loughran, J. & Russell, T.(2006).Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020-1041.

Krell, G., Riedmüller, B., Sieben, B., & Vinz, D. (2007). Einleitung - Diversity Studies als integrierende Forschungsrichtung [Introduction - Diversity studies as an integrative research direction]. In G. Krell, B. Riedmüller, B. Sieben & D. Vinz (Eds.), Diversity Studies. Grundlagen und disziplinäre Ansätze (pp. 7-16). Frankfurt: Campus.

Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2011). Professional vision and the politics of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 505-514.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

Markic, S., & Abels, S. (2014). Heterogeneity and Diversity – A Growing Challenge or Enrichment for Science Education in German Schools? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(4), 271–283.

Meijer, C. J. W. (2010). Special needs education in Europe inclusive policies and practices. Zeitschrift für Inklusion, 4(2), www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/136/136.

Menthe, J., Abels, S., Blumberg, E., Fromme, T., Marohn, A., Nehring, A., & Rott, L. (2017). Netzwerk Inklusiver naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht [Network of Inclusive Science Education]. In C. Maurer (Ed.), Implementation fachdidaktischer Innovation im Spiegel von Forschung und Praxis (pp. 800-802). Regensburg: GDCP.

Musenberg, O., & Riegert, J. (2014). »Pharao geht immer!« Die Vermittlung zwischen Sache und Subjekt als didaktische Herausforderung im inklusiven Geschichtsunterricht der Sekundarstufe. Eine explorative Interview-Studie. ["Pharaoh is always right!"- The mediation between the object and the subject as a didactic challenge in the inclusive history education of the secondary level. An exploratory interview study]. Zeitschrift für Inklusion, 0(4), www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/202/207.

Naraian, S., Ferguson, D. L., & Thomas, N. (2011). Transforming for inclusive practice: professional development to support the inclusion of students labelled as emotionally disturbed. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(7), 721-740.

Nilsson, L. (2012). Using video methods in grounded theory research. In V. B. Martin & A. Gynnild (Eds.), Grounded theory: the philosophy, method and work of Barney Glaser (pp. 103-116). Boca Raton: Brown Walker.

Puddu, S., Keller, E., & Lembens, A. (2012). Potentials of Lernwerkstatt (Open Inquiry) for pre-service teachers’ professional development. E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2011 Conference. Part 12 (co-ed. D. Psillos & R. M. Sperandeo). In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien & P. Clément (Eds.), ESERA 2011 Conference (pp. 153-159). Lyon: ESERA.

Schwindt, K. (2008). Lehrpersonen betrachten Unterricht. Kriterien für die kompetente Unterrichtswahrnehmung [Teachers look at education. Criteria for the competent teaching perception]. Münster: Waxmann.

Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2007). Science learning in special education: The case for constructed versus instructed learning. Exceptionality, 15(2), 57-74.

Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Okolo, C. M. (2008). Science and social studies for students with disabilities. Focus on Exeptional Children, 41(2), 1-24.

Seidel, T., Stürmer, K.,Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M. & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of video-taped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 259-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009

Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 1-27). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers' professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383-395). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.

Sliwka, A. (2010). From homogeneity to diversity in German education. In OECD (Ed.), Educating Teachers for diversity (pp. 205-217). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Spratt, J., & Florian, L. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy: From learning to action. Supporting each individual in the context of ‘everybody’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 89-96.

Strieker, T., Logan, K., & Kuhel, K. (2011). Effects of job-embedded professional development on inclusion of students with disabilities in content area classrooms: results of a three-year study. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16, 1047-1065.

Symeonidou, S., & Phtiaka, H. (2009). Using teachers' prior knowledge, attitudes and beliefs to develop in-service teacher education courses for inclusion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 543-550.

The Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5-8.

Therrien, W. J., Taylor, J. C.Hosp, J. L., Kaldenberg, E. R., & Gorsh, J. (2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 188-203.

UNESCO (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all. Retrieved 11 Jan 2012, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001402/140224e.pdf.

United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved 21 Feb 2012, from http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.

van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Walkowiak, M., Rott, L., Abels, S., & Nehring, A. (2018). Network and work for inclusive science education. In I. Eilks, S. Markic, & B. Ralle (Eds.), Building bridges across disciplines (pp. 269–274). Aachen: Shaker.

Weber, L. (1977). An approach to natural materials. In R. Dropkin (Ed.), The teacher as learner (pp. 28-32). New York: City College Workshop Center.

Published
2019-09-06
How to Cite
Abels, S. (2019). Science Teacher Professional Development for Inclusive Practice. International Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 11(1), 19-29. Retrieved from http://ijpce.org/index.php/IJPCE/article/view/17