Investigating of Relationships between Attitudes towards Physics Laboratories, Motivation and Amotivation for the Class Engagement


Abstract views: 581 / PDF downloads: 562

Authors

  • Ali Eryılmaz Ankara Lisesi (Anadolu), Ankara
  • İsmail Yıldız Ayrancı Anadolu Lisesi, Ankara
  • Sedef Akın Aydınlıkevler Anadolu Lisesi, Ankara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v3iSI.123

Keywords:

Motivation, Class Engagement, Attitudes towards Physics Laboratory

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between high school students’ attitudes towards physics laboratories, their motivation and amotivation levels for the class engagement. The study was carried out on 114 male and 180 female (total 294) adolescents attending high schools and their age range is 14-17. The data of the study was collected by means of The Attitudes towards Physics Laboratories Scale and Motivation and Amotivation for the Class Engagement Scale. In the analysis of the data, simple regression analysis was used. According to the results of the analysis, it was observed that the students who have negative attitudes towards physics laboratory have lack of motivation for class engagement, and also the students who have positive attitudes towards physics laboratory have motivation for class engagement (R2=0.14; F=22.31, p<0.00). Findings were discussed in the context of the literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayas, A., Çepni, S. & Akdeniz, A.R. (1994). Fen bilimleri eğitiminde laboratuarın yeri ve önemi (II): Laboratuvar uygulamalarında amaçlar ve yaklaşımlar, Çağdaş Eğitim, 19, 7-12.

Azizoglu, N. & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2006). Kimya Laboratuvarı Endişe Ölçeği, H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 55-62.

Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M. & Sheldon, B. (1997). The impact of teaching strategies on intrinsic motivation. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ED 418 925).

Bozanoğlu, İ. (2004). Akademik güdülenme ölçeği: Geliştirmesi, geçerliği, güvenirliği, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2): 83-98.

Domin, D.S. (1999). A Content Analysis of General Chemistry Laboratory Manuals for Evidence of Higher-Order Cognitive Tasks, Journal of Chemical Education, 76(1), 109-111.

Eccles, J., Wigfield, A. & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1017-1095). New York: Wiley.

Eryılmaz, A. (2009). Okulda motivasyon ve amotivasyon: Planlı çalışma. X. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.

Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Okulda motivasyon ve amotivasyon ölçeklerinin geliştirilmesi. XVI. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi. Mersin Üniversitesi, Mersin.

Finn, J. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Wasginhton DC: NCES Publication.

Garnett, P.J. & Garnett, P.J. (1995). Refocussing the chemistrylab.: A case for laboratory based investigations, Australian Secience Teachers Journal, 41(2), 26-33.

Hofstein, A. (2004). The Laboratory in Chemistry Education: Thirty Years of Experience With 13. Developments, Implementation, and Research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice 5(3), 247-264.

Maehr, M. & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A school-wide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3&4), 399-428.

Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student from secondary schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, 14 – 24.

Newmann, F.M., Wehlage, G.G. & Lamborn, S.D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F.M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11 – 39). NewYork: Teachers College Press.

Nuhoğlu, H. & Yalçın, N. (2004). Fizik Laboratuvarına Yönelik Bir Tutum Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi ve Öğretmen Adaylarının Fizik Laboratuvarına Yönelik Tutumlarının Değerlendirilmesi. KEFAD, 5, (2), 317-327.

Pintrich, P.R. & Maehr, M.L. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivating students, improving schools (Vol. 13). Oxford, England: JAI, An Imprint of Elsevier Science.

Singer, S., Hilton, M. & Schweingruber, H. (2005). Needing a New Approach to Science Labs. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 10.

Üredi, I. & Üredi, L. (2005). ilköğretim 8. Snııf öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançlarının matematik başarısını yordama gücü. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1 (2) 250-260.

Yılmaz, H., & Huyugüzel-Çavuş, P. (2007). Fen öğrenimine yönelik motivasyon ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 6(3) 430-440.

Willms, J.D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

Downloads

Published

01/11/2011

How to Cite

Eryılmaz, A., Yıldız, İsmail, & Akın, S. (2011). Investigating of Relationships between Attitudes towards Physics Laboratories, Motivation and Amotivation for the Class Engagement. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(SI), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v3iSI.123