The Effect of Between Class Ability Grouping on 7th Grade Students’ Academic Achievement on the Unit “If there were no pressure?” In Science and Technology Education


Abstract views: 230 / PDF downloads: 115

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v1i1.6

Keywords:

Between Class Ability Grouping, Ability Grouping Class, Science Education, Academic Achievement

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of between class ability grouping on 7th grade students’ academic achievement on the unit “If there were no pressure?” in Science and Technology Education. The study was conducted in the second semester of 2006-2007 academic year within a primary school with between class ability grouping in Aydın. The sample of the study is made of total 84 students among the 7th grades from the selected school which has between class ability grouping. “Science Education achievement test” developed by the researchers was used for data collection. Co-variance analysis was performed for analyzing the data gathered in the study. Significant differences were found among the ability grouping classes with regard to achievement test scores (p<0.05). The difference was observed between high-medium classes, high-low classes and mediumlow classes. While significant difference was not found among achievement scores of the female students in ability grouping classes (p>0.05), this was reverse for the male students (significant difference was found among the male students with regard to achievement test scores).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbaba, A. (1996). İlköğretim Kurumlarında Seviye Sınıfları ve Uygulama (Level Classes and Practice in Primary Education Institutions). Çağdaş Eğitim, 21(226), 36–38.

Aldan Karademir, Ç. (2007). Düzey Dersliklerinin İlköğretim 6. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilgisi Dersine İlişkin Akademik Başarıları ve Benlik Saygısı Üzerine Etkisi (The Effect of Level Classrooms on Academic Achievement and Self-Esteem of Primary School 6th Grade Students Related to Science Course). Unpublished mater's thesis, Adnan Menderes University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Atılgan, H. (2006). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme (Assessment and Evaluation in Education). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Başaran, İ.E. (2000). Eğitimin Psikolojik Temelleri - Eğitim Psikolojisi (Psychological Foundations of Education - Educational Psychology). Ankara: Feryal Matbaası.

Betts, J. R. & Shkolnik, J.L. (2000). The Effects of Ability Grouping on Student Achievement and Resource Allocation in Secondary Schools. Economics of Education Review, 19, 1–15.

Braddock, J.H. & Dawkins, M.P. (1993). Ability Grouping, Aspirations, And Attainments: Evidence From The National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 324–336.

Braddock, J.H. & McPartland, J.M. (1990). Alternatives To Tracking. Educational Leadership, 47(6), 76–79.

Brewer, D.J., Rees, D.J. & Argys, L.M. (1995). Detracking America’s Schools: The Reform Without Cost?. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 210–215.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (Manual of data analysis for social sciences). Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.

Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D., &Turgut, M. F. (1996). Fizik Öğretimi. Ankara: Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi Deneme Basımı (Physics Teaching. Ankara: National Education Development Project Pre-Service Teacher Education Trial Edition). Ankara: YÖK.

Doğanay, A. (Ed.). (2007). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri (Principles and Methods of Teaching). Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.

Doğruöz, P. (1998). Bilimsel İşlem Becerilerini Kullanmaya Yönelik Yöntemin Öğrencilerin Akışkanların Kaldırma Kuvveti Konusunu Anlamalarına Etkisi (Effect of science process skill oriented lesson on understanding of fluid force concepts). Unpublished mater's thesis, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.

Felmlee, D. ve Eder D. (1983). Contextual Effects in the Classroom: The Impacts of Ability Groups on Student Interaction. Sociology of Education, 56, 77–87.

Gamaron, A. (1992). Is Ability Grouping Equitable? Educational Leadership, 50(2), 11–17.

Glatthorn, A.A. (1987). Curriculum Renewal. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Germann, P.J. (1994). Testing a Model of Science Process Skills Acquisition: an Interaction with Parents’ Education, Preferred Language, Gender, Science Attitude, Cognitive Development, Academic Ability, and Biology Knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (7), 749-783.

Gömleksiz, M. (1997). Düzey Kümeleri: Temeleğitim İkinci Aşama Öğrencileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma (Level Groupings: A Study on Basic Education Second Stage Students). Adana: Baki Kitap ve Yayınevi, No.ll.

Gözütok, D.F. (Ed.). (2006). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri (Principles and Methods of Teaching). Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.

Gürdal, A., Şahin, F., & Çağlar, A. (2001). Fen Eğitimi: İlkeler, Stratejiler ve Yöntemler (Science Education: Principles, Strategies, and Methods). Marmara Üniversitesi Yayını No: 668, İstanbul.

Halis, İ. (2002). Demokratik Sınıf Ortamı İçin Profesyonel Sınıf Yönetimi (Professional Classroom Management for the Democratic Classroom Environment). (2nd Ed.). Konya: Mikro Yayınları.

Karabacak, K. (2001). İlköğretimde Seviye Gruplaması (Ability grouping in primary school). Unpublished mater's thesis, Sakarya University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Karasar, N. (2003). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (Scientific Research Methods). (12th Ed.). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları

Kitchen, D.J. (1990). Ability Grouping and Dropping out. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(6), 1978-A.

Kulik, J.A. & Kulik, C.L.C. (1992). Meta-Analytic Findings On Grouping Programs. Gifted Child Ouarterly, 36(2), 73–77.

MEB, (2003). TIMSS 1999 3. Uluslararası Matematik ve Fen Bilgisi Çalışması Ulusal Rapor (TIMSS 1999, The Third International Mathematics and Science Study National Report). http://earged.meb.gov.tr/

MEB, (2005). PISA 2003 Projesi Ulusal Nihai Rapor (PISA 2003 Project National Final Report). www.pisa.oecd.org.

Mills, C.J. & Durden, W.G. (1992). Cooperative Learning And Ability Grouping: An Issue of Choice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(1), 11–16.

Oakes, J. (1991). Keeping Track. Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Educational Issues. J.Wm. Noll (editör). Connecticut: The Dushkin Publishing Group. 276–285.

Oakes, J. & Guiton, G. (1995). Matchmaking: The Dynamics Of High School Tracking Decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 3–34.

Slavin, R.E. (1987). Ability Grouping and Student Achievement In Elementary Schools: A Best Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 293–336.

Slavin, R.E. (1990). Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 471–499.

Tanrıöğen, A. (Ed.). (2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Scientific Research Methods). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Tekin, H. (2004). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme (Assessment and Evaluation in Education). Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.

Toomela, A., Kikas. E. & Mottus, E. (2006). Ability Grouping in Schools: A Study of Academic Achievement in Five Schools in Estonia. Trames, 10(60/55), 1, 32–43.

Downloads

Published

02/20/2009

How to Cite

Aldan Karademir, Çiğdem, & Uçak, E. (2009). The Effect of Between Class Ability Grouping on 7th Grade Students’ Academic Achievement on the Unit “If there were no pressure?” In Science and Technology Education. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 1(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v1i1.6